Skip to main content

122 Bio-char & Bio-oil Plants, One Clear Winner: What the Data Says About Carbon Removal's Quiet Revolution

We mapped 122 Bio-char and Bio-oil plants across 30+ countries. 82% are already operational, Puro.earth dominates carbon credits with 86% market share, and 2024 was the biggest deployment year on record. Here's what the data actually tells us.

There are 122 Bio-char and Bio-oil plants operating or under development across more than 30 countries. While BECCS and direct air capture dominate the carbon removal conversation, biochar has quietly become one of the most commercially mature carbon dioxide removal (CDR) pathways on the planet. We built an interactive dashboard over the Global Bio-char & Bio-oil Plants Database — now available on Energy Data Insights. Here's what the data reveals. The Numbers at a Glance !KPI banner: 122 total plants, 100 operational, 12 planned, Puro.earth as top platform Four numbers define the sector: 122 unique plants tracked across 30+ countries, 100 already operational, 12 in the planned pipeline, and Puro.earth standing as the dominant carbon credit marketplace. This is not an emerging technology — it is a functioning industry with a global operational footprint. The US Leads, But Europe Is the Innovation Hub !Bar chart: Bio-char & Bio-oil plants by country — USA leads with 31 plants, Sweden 2nd with 11 The United States accounts for 31 plants — roughly 25% of the global total. But the more interesting story is Sweden at #2 with 11 plants. For a country of 10 million people, Sweden's density of biochar investment is extraordinary, driven by aggressive national climate targets and deep integration between biochar and district heating infrastructure. India (7), Germany (6), Canada (6), and Australia (6) round out the top tier — a genuinely global spread that contrasts sharply with BECCS, which is heavily concentrated in the US and UK. 82% Operational: This Sector Has Already Crossed the Chasm !Donut chart: 82% operational, 10% planned, 4% pilot, 3% demonstration The project phase split is the most important signal in the dataset. 82% of tracked plants are fully operational. Only 10% are in the planned phase. This is not a technology waiting for its commercial moment — it has already arrived. The remaining 14% (pilots and demonstrations) represent R&D at the frontier, not proof-of-concept for the mainstream. Biochar vs Bio-Oil: Not a Close Race !Stacked bar chart: Biochar 103 plants, Both 14 plants, Bio-Oil 4 plants, by project phase The facility type split reveals a market reality: Biochar dominates with 103 plants, "Both" products at 14, and pure Bio-Oil at just 4. Bio-oil production is technically more complex and faces a less developed off-take market. Biochar, by contrast, has an established agricultural demand curve — it improves soil structure, sequesters carbon for hundreds of years, and commands premium prices in voluntary carbon markets. Woody Biomass Rules Feedstock !Horizontal bar chart: feedstocks — Woody Biomass 51, Forestry Residues 47, Agricultural Residues 42 Woody Biomass leads primary feedstock with 51 plants, followed by Forestry Residues (47) and Agricultural Residues (42). The top three are all biomass waste streams — a critical sustainability signal. Unlike purpose-grown energy crops, these feedstocks represent residue

Read the full article on Energy Data Insights.